Passage I. When schools closed during the COVID-19 pandemic, teaching moved almost overnight to mobile phones and computer screens. For many urban students the change was inconvenient but manageable; for lakhs of children in poorer households it meant a long interruption of learning, because a smartphone, a stable internet connection and a quiet corner at home could not be taken for granted. Surveys conducted during 2020 and 2021 reported that many children shared a single device with siblings and working parents. Teachers, too, had to master new tools with little training. The episode taught planners two lessons: technology can extend the reach of good teaching, but it cannot replace the school; and any digital programme must first close the access gap, or it will quietly widen the very inequalities it claims to address.
The central concern of Passage I is:
- (a) the technical superiority of online teaching over classroom teaching
- (b) how the sudden shift to online learning exposed unequal access to education
- (c) the refusal of teachers to learn new technology
- (d) the permanent replacement of schools by technology
A main-idea answer must cover the whole passage (Part A, Step 4): the passage keeps returning to unequal access. (a) and (d) contradict the line "it cannot replace the school" — (d) also uses the extreme word "permanent"; (c) blames teachers, which the passage never does.