Statistical Tests & Research Approaches
Hypothesis testing from first principles, then z, t, F, ANCOVA, chi-square and the rank tests, with which test to use when; then the research half: paradigms, designs, Campbell & Stanley, qualitative approaches, action research, sampling and ethics. Quiz 16 tests it.
THE LOGIC OF A SIGNIFICANCE TEST
A.1 Describing a group, or generalising from it
ch03 teaches descriptive statistics, which describe only the group actually measured: the mean, SD and correlation of this class. Inferential statistics go one step further and use a sample to draw conclusions about the population it came from. Every test in this note (z, t, F, χ², U, H) is inferential.
| Population | Sample | |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Every unit you want to conclude about, e.g. all Class IX pupils in Delhi government schools | The units you actually measured, e.g. 200 of them |
| A value describing it is a… | Parameter | Statistic |
| Mean | μ | M |
| Standard deviation | σ | s |
| Correlation | ρ | r |
Inference estimates parameters from statistics. A sample can mislead only by chance, and a significance test is a rule for deciding how much chance to tolerate.
Trap: the Greek ρ in this table is the population correlation. Spearman's ρ (Part G) is a different quantity that happens to share the letter.
A.2 The sampling distribution and the standard error
Draw a random sample of 100 pupils and compute its mean. Draw another 100 and the mean will differ a little. Repeat many times and the means themselves form a distribution, the sampling distribution of the mean. Its standard deviation has its own name, the standard error (SE).
SE of the mean = σ / √N (σ unknown in practice → estimated from s)
Two consequences that examiners use:
- The SE shrinks as N grows, but only as √N, so quadrupling N halves the SE.
- The SD of the scores does not shrink as N grows. A bigger sample estimates the spread more accurately; it does not reduce it.
Worked example A2 — what a bigger sample buys
Population SD σ = 10.
N = 100: SE = 10 / √100 = 10 / 10 = 1
N = 400: SE = 10 / √400 = 10 / 20 = 0.5 (four times the sample, half the SE)
The SD of the pupils' scores is still 10. Only the SE has fallen.
Central limit theorem. For large random samples, conventionally N > 30, sample means are normally distributed about μ with SD equal to the SE, whatever the shape of the population. That is why a z-test can be used on a large sample even when the scores themselves are skewed. The figure 30 is a convention, not part of the theorem.
Small sample means N ≤ 30 by the same convention. A small sample with σ unknown uses the t distribution, not z (Part C).
Trap: "a larger sample reduces the SD of the scores" is false. Only the SE falls.
A.3 Two hypotheses
| Null hypothesis (H₀) | Research / alternative hypothesis (H₁) | |
|---|---|---|
| States | No difference, no relationship | The effect the researcher expects |
| Status | The one actually tested | Supported indirectly, when H₀ is rejected |
| Also called | The statistical hypothesis | The substantive hypothesis |
| Example | "There is no difference between the mean scores of pupils taught by the activity method and by the lecture method." | "Pupils taught by the activity method will score higher than those taught by lecture." |
A directional H₁ ("higher", "lower") takes a one-tailed test. A non-directional H₁ ("there will be a difference") takes a two-tailed test. The choice is made before the data are seen.
A.4 Level of significance, critical region and the decision
- Level of significance (α) is the probability of a Type I error (rejecting a true H₀). It is fixed in advance, conventionally at .05 or .01 (sometimes .001).
- The critical value marks off the critical (rejection) region, the tail area whose total is α. In a two-tailed test at .05 that is 2.5% in each tail. A one-tailed test puts all 5% in one tail, which is why its critical value is smaller.
- The p-value is the probability of a result at least as extreme as the one obtained if H₀ were true. H₀ is rejected when p is at or below α.
- Not rejecting H₀ does not prove it true. The correct wording is "H₀ is retained" or "not rejected". Older texts say "H₀ is accepted". Prefer "retained", but accept "accepted" when it is the only option offered.
- Confidence level = 1 − α. The 95% limits for a mean are M ± 1.96 SE; the 99% limits are M ± 2.58 SE.
The critical-value card (z, normal curve)
| Level | Two-tailed | One-tailed |
|---|---|---|
| .05 | 1.96 | 1.645 |
| .01 | 2.58 | 2.33 |
One-tailed values are read from the .10 and .02 columns of a two-tailed table. Decision rule, two-tailed: reject H₀ at .05 if the absolute value of z is 1.96 or more, and at .01 if it is 2.58 or more.
Trap: "p = .03 means there is a 3% chance that H₀ is true." False. p is computed assuming H₀ is true; it is the probability of data this extreme, not the probability of the hypothesis. Equally false: "a non-significant result proves H₀."
A.5 The steps, in order
- State H₀ and H₁; the direction of H₁ decides one- or two-tailed.
- Fix the level of significance (α).
- Choose the test by scale, design and assumptions (Part I), and note its df.
- Compute the test statistic from the data.
- Compare it with the critical value, or compare p with α.
- Decide: reject or retain H₀, and interpret the result in words.
Worked example A1 — a z test on one mean
A school's Class X pupils (N = 100) score a mean of 52 on a standardised test
whose population mean is 50 and population SD is 10. Does the school differ?
H₀: μ = 50 H₁: μ ≠ 50 (non-directional → two-tailed)
Step 1 SE = σ / √N = 10 / √100 = 10 / 10 = 1
Step 2 z = (M − μ) / SE = (52 − 50) / 1 = 2.00
Step 3 Two-tailed: 2.00 ≥ 1.96 → reject H₀ at .05
2.00 < 2.58 → retain H₀ at .01
Step 4 One-tailed (only if H₁ "higher" had been fixed in advance):
2.00 ≥ 1.645 → reject at .05
2.00 < 2.33 → retain at .01
Check 95% limits: 52 ± 1.96 × 1 = 50.04 to 53.96 — 50 lies outside → reject at .05
99% limits: 52 ± 2.58 × 1 = 49.42 to 54.58 — 50 lies inside → retain at .01
The check line is worth remembering: for a test on a mean, a two-tailed test at α and the (1 − α) confidence interval always agree.
The rest of this note
- THE LOGIC OF A SIGNIFICANCE TEST
- ERRORS, POWER AND DEGREES OF FREEDOM
- PARAMETRIC TESTS I: ASSUMPTIONS, z AND t
- PARAMETRIC TESTS II: ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE, COVARIANCE AND CORRELATION
- NON-PARAMETRIC TESTS: MEANING, USES AND LIMITS
- CHI-SQUARE
- RANK CORRELATION: SPEARMAN AND KENDALL
- TESTS ON RANKS AND SIGNS: MANN–WHITNEY TO FRIEDMAN
- CHOOSING THE TEST
- RESEARCH PARADIGMS AND APPROACHES
- TYPES OF RESEARCH: PURPOSE AND METHOD
- EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH: DESIGNS, VALIDITY AND CONTROL
- QUALITATIVE APPROACHES AND ACTION RESEARCH
- THE DESIGN TOOLKIT: VARIABLES, HYPOTHESES, SAMPLING, TOOLS AND ETHICS
- THE EXAMINER'S ANGLE
- COMMON ERRORS THAT COST MARKS
- QUICK REVISION
- SOURCES, AND WHERE THEY DISAGREE